LETTER TO THE EDITOR


https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-11010-1005
Indian Journal of Respiratory Care
Volume 12 | Issue 1 | Year 2023

Closed Pleural Biopsy is Effective and Safe but Needs Addition of Ultrasound Thorax


Vinod Govindasaami

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Sri Ramachandra Medical Centre, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research (Deemed to be University), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

Corresponding Author: Vinod Govindasaami, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Sri Ramachandra Medical Centre, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research (Deemed to be University), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India, Phone: +91 9789378010, e-mail: v.g.vinod14@gmail.com

Received on: 19 August 2022; Accepted on: 05 December 2022; Published on: 14 March 2023

How to cite this article: Govindasaami V. Closed Pleural Biopsy is Effective and Safe but Needs Addition of Ultrasound Thorax. Indian J Respir Care 2023;12(1):106-106.

Source of support: Nil

Conflict of interest: None

Dear Sir,

I read the article published in your journal by Dole et al., “Diagnostic yield and safety of closed pleural biopsy in exudative pleural effusions.” It provided good insights in the use and yield of the technique in both malignant and nonmalignant conditions. I would like to add the following comments.

The authors have mentioned that the site for pleural biopsy was chosen with careful clinical and radiological correlation in the study population. The imaging modality that the patients had before the biopsy was not mentioned. Whether all the patients were subjected to computed tomography (CT) before the pleural biopsy was not explained clearly in the methodology. CT, compared to chest roentgenogram, clearly has an advantage in choosing sites for biopsy as it can delineate pleural nodularity sites with precision.

The authors have mentioned the usage of ultrasound only for loculated pleural effusion, but it has been shown that ultrasound guidance improves the yield of closed biopsy by identifying abnormal areas, especially in malignant pleural effusions where the pleural involvement usually is not diffuse, and a blind biopsy might not sample the involved areas leading to poor diagnostic yield.1 Clinical practice guideline recommends the addition of ultrasound for pleural interventions.2,3

The diagnostic yield of a test is defined as the likelihood of the test resulting in a diagnosis.4 The numerator has to have biopsies resulting in specific diagnosis and the denominator should include the total number of biopsies carried out in the study.4 The authors have calculated the overall diagnostic yield of the study to be 78% as they have excluded 13 patients where the sample was inadequate. The yield should include those patients also and should have been 66% (67/101).

REFERENCES

1. Lin Z, Wu D, Wang J, et al. Diagnostic value of ultrasound-guided needle biopsy in undiagnosed pleural effusions. Medicine 2020;99(27):e21076. DOI: 10.1097/MD.000000000002107

2. Feller-Kopman DJ, Reddy CB, DeCamp MM, et al. Management of malignant pleural effusions. an official ATS/STS/STR clinical practice guideline. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2018;198(7):839–849. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201807-1415ST

3. www.brit-thoracic.org.UK [Internet]. [cited 2022 Nov 30]. Available from: https://www.brit-thoracic.org.uk/media/455880/bts-clinical-statement-on-pleural-procedures-consultation-jun-2022.pdf

4. Diagnostic yield vs diagnostic accuracy [Internet]. ROJoson Medical Clinic. 2016 [cited 2022 Nov 30]. Available from: https://rojosonmedicalclinic.wordpress.com/2016/10/03/diagnostic-yield-vs-diagnostic-accuracy/

________________________
© The Author(s). 2023 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-share alike license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) which permits unrestricted distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as original. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.