CASE REPORT |
https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-11010-1105 |
Neuroendocrine Tumor of Larynx—A Rare Entity: A Case Report
1–3Department of Pathology, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India
Corresponding Author: Sufian Zaheer, Department of Pathology, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India, Phone: +919650594818, e-mail: sufianzaheer@gmail.com
Received: 04 November 2023; Accepted: 23 April 2023; Published on: 18 June 2024
ABSTRACT
Neuroendocrine laryngeal neoplasms are uncommon and comprise only 1% of all laryngeal neoplasms. These tumors are characterized by cells showing various degrees of pleomorphism that are arranged in nests and trabeculae containing neurosecretory granules, which show immunohistochemical positivity for synaptophysin, chromogranin, and neuron-specific enolase (NSE). Here, we present a rare case of neuroendocrine tumor (NET) grade III of the supraglottic region. The patient presented with a change in voice for 3 years and difficulty in swallowing solid and liquid both for the last 4 months. Histopathological examination showed a lobular architecture with cells exhibiting moderate pleomorphism and finely stippled chromatin. In immunohistochemistry (IHC), these cells showed positivity for synaptophysin and chromogranin with a Ki-67 index of 25%, thus confirming the diagnosis of NET, grade III.
How to cite this article: Jain S, Ahuja S, Zaheer S. Neuroendocrine Tumor of Larynx—A Rare Entity: A Case Report. Indian J Respir Care 2024;13(2):117–120.
Source of support: Nil
Conflict of interest: None
Patient consent statement: The author(s) have obtained written informed consent from the patient for publication of the case report details and related images.
Keywords: Case report, Grade, Larynx, Neuroendocrine carcinoma, Neuroendocrine tumor, Supraglottis, Synaptophysin
INTRODUCTION
Neuroendocrine laryngeal neoplasms are uncommon and account for only 1% of all laryngeal neoplasms.1 The first incidence of neuroendocrine tumor (NET) was described in 1969, and since then, the terminology of laryngeal neuroendocrine neoplasm (NENs) has improved significantly.2 NENs are categorized into three broad types based on histology and clinical behavior—(1) well-differentiated NETs; (2) neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC), with two different types: (a) small cell carcinoma, and (b) large cell NEC; (3) mixed neuroendocrine nonneuroendocrine neoplasms.3 The genesis of these tumors is unknown, with several ideas proposed; the most widely accepted theory is that they are derived from neuroendocrine precursor cells. Smoking is the most significant predisposing factor. The present case report offers a distinctive perspective on the clinical presentation, diagnostic challenges, and treatment considerations of neuroendocrine grade III tumor, which is a rare tumor in comparison to the typical/atypical carcinoids and NECs. By highlighting the specific classification of the tumor as a grade III NET, we contribute to the broader understanding of this rare entity and emphasize the importance of accurate histopathological characterization. Additionally, the specific location and extent of the tumor, as well as the detailed histopathological and immunohistochemical findings, provide valuable insights into the varied manifestations and characteristics of neuroendocrine laryngeal neoplasms. Here, we report a case of a supraglottic grade III NET in a 52-year-old reformed smoker.
CASE DESCRIPTION
A 52-year-old male presented with a change in voice for 3 years and difficulty in swallowing solid and liquid both for the last 4 months. General physical examination was within normal limits. Bilateral air entry was equal on respiratory examination.
He was a reformed smoker, had a known case of diabetes mellitus for 10 years, and was on oral hypoglycemic drugs. There was no history of hypertension, pulmonary tuberculosis, or head/neck malignancy in his family. Indirect laryngoscopy revealed globular growth arising from the right arytenoid and aryepiglottic fold. Bilateral vocal cords were not visible. His other biochemical investigations were within normal limits. A computed tomography scan of the neck showed a lobulated heterogeneously enhancing, soft tissue lesion involving the right aryepiglottic fold, posterior pharyngeal wall, and anterior aspect of true vocal cord on the right side with partial effacement of the right pyriform fossa (Fig. 1).
Elective tracheostomy and direct laryngoscopic excisional biopsy of the mass were performed under general anesthesia. Histopathology report showed a lobular architecture separated by fibrous septa. These cells exhibited moderate pleomorphism and were medium in size, with a moderate amount of eosinophilic cytoplasm and salt pepper chromatin. Based on IHC analysis, these cells were immunopositive for synaptophysin and chromogranin and negative for thyroid transcription factor-1 (TTF-1) and p63 with a Ki-67 index of 25%, confirming the diagnosis of NET, grade III (Fig. 2).
DISCUSSION
Neuroendocrine laryngeal tumors are the most frequent nonepidermoid tumors of the larynx, accounting for <1% of all laryngeal tumors.4 Small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (SCNEC) (41%) is the most common laryngeal NEN documented, followed by NET G2 (37%) and NET G1 (5.3%).5,6 Patients with laryngeal NENs are usually middle-aged to elderly and have a history of heavy smoking.5-7 A strong predilection for the supraglottic region has been reported previously, with the aryepiglottic fold being the primary subsite, which was similar to our case. The majority of the symptoms and presentation mimic a classical laryngeal malignancy and can only be differentiated by histopathologic evaluation. NETs are characterized by cells showing various degrees of pleomorphism that are arranged in nests, cords, and trabeculae containing neurosecretory granules which show immunohistochemical positivity for synaptophysin, chromogranin, and neuron-specific enolase (NSE).8
On a small biopsy, the histological findings of laryngeal NENs might be confused for more common pathologic entities. Cellular monotony, fine-stippled nuclear chromatin, and a myriad of histomorphological patterns lying in a fibrovascular stroma were characteristics of NET G2 tumors. The peculiar ”glomeruloid structures” are a distinctive characteristic of this entity. The differential diagnoses for NET include squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), melanoma, salivary gland neoplasms, paraganglioma, medullary thyroid carcinoma, glomus tumor, and plasmacytoma. If the monotony of neoplastic cells and organoid pattern is ignored on low-power examination, they may be misdiagnosed as SCC, the most common laryngeal cancer.9 Laryngeal NEN therapy strategies are not standardized because they are uncommon, and there is little clinical experience with them. Depending on the biological characteristics of the various histological types and the stage of the disease, several therapeutic modalities are used to treat laryngeal NETs. Surgery continues to be the mainstay of NET G3 treatment, and the function of radiation and chemoradiotherapy is still unclear. However, for the majority of NEC patients, chemotherapy, with or without radiotherapy, is the main course of treatment.5,10 NETs classified as grade I or II have an average prognosis of 48% for the first 5 years and 30% for the 10th year of survival; however, grade III NETs have a worse prognosis of 29% for the first 5 years of median survival.10 However, the prognosis and 5-year survival of NET grade III is better than NEC. Hence, it is essential to differentiate between the two entities. NET grade III is relatively well differentiated, with a high Ki-67 proliferation index. On the contrary, NECs are poorly differentiated with necrosis and abundant mitosis.11 Ki-67 is the most widely utilized prognostic biomarker and serves as the foundation for NET grading. Furthermore, Yuan et al. have proposed that insulinoma associated protein 1 (INSM1) plays a critical role in the diagnosis and categorization of laryngeal NEC.12,13Table 1 summarizes the clinicopathological findings of previously reported cases of NENs of the larynx.14-19
Author (year) | Age/sex | Clinical presentation | Clinical diagnosis | Radiological findings | Histopathology | Treatment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rai et al.(2017)14 | 50/M | Change in voice, dysphagia, and dyspnea | Ulceroproliferative growth | CECT: A soft tissue lesion with smooth outlines in the left piriform fossa with involvement of left AE fold | Atypical carcinoid | Total laryngectomy |
Paudel et al.(2020)15 | 50/F | Throat pain, hoarseness, and dysphagia | Cystic mass | NET grade II | Complete endoscopic excision | |
Y et al.(2021)16 | 65/M | Pharyngeal paresthesia | Hemangioma | Atypical carcinoid | Partial laryngectomy | |
Mesolella et al. (2021)17 | 68/M | Dysphagia and dysphonia | Ulcer-vegetative growth | CT: A voluminous expansive neoformation that presented enhancement after contrast into the left lateral wall of the larynx | Small cell NEC | Total laryngectomy with radical neck dissection with neoadjuvant CT and RT |
Zhu et al.(2015)18 | 61/F | Hoarseness, sore throat, hemoptysis, a lump sensation, and dyspnea | Typical carcinoid | Endolaryngeal microsurgery | ||
60/F | Typical carcinoid | Total laryngectomy with neck dissection | ||||
75/M | Atypical carcinoid | Partial laryngectomy with neck dissection | ||||
62/M | Atypical carcinoid | Partial laryngectomy with neck dissection | ||||
66/F | Atypical carcinoid | Partial laryngectomy and neck dissection and radiotherapy | ||||
30/F | Atypical carcinoid | Partial laryngectomy | ||||
66/M | Atypical carcinoid | Total laryngectomy and neck dissection and radiotherapy | ||||
53/F | Small cell NEC | Chemotherapy and radiotherapy | ||||
66/M | Small cell NEC | Induction chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and adjuvant chemotherapy | ||||
27/F | Small cell NEC | CRT and chemotherapy | ||||
50/M | Small cell NEC | Chemotherapy and radiotherapy | ||||
54/M | Small cell NEC | Induction chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and adjuvant chemotherapy | ||||
52/M | Small cell NEC and adenocarcinoma | Partial laryngectomy, neck dissection, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy | ||||
16/F | Small cell NEC | Chemotherapy and radiotherapy | ||||
Feola et al.(2020)19 | 59/M | Dysphagia and dyspnea | CT: A vascularized lesion of the supraglottic left hemilarynx | NET grade II | Tumor debulking |
CECT, contrast enhanced computed tomography; CT, computed tomography; F, female; M, male, NEC, neuroendocrine carcinoma; NET, neuroendocrine tumor; RT, radiotherapy; CRT, chemoradiotherapy
Neuroendocrine tumors are frequently observed in the gastrointestinal and respiratory tract, rarely in the head and neck region. We would want to highlight the present case because laryngeal NETs are a very uncommon entity when compared to tumors with epidermal origin. It is critical to get an accurate diagnosis of the NET subtype because treatment and prognosis differ. Conservative surgery, such as endoscopic excision and supraglottic laryngectomy, are preferable alternatives, although larger lesions may require total laryngectomy.
CONCLUSION
Neuroendocrine tumors of the larynx are extremely rare, accounting for only 1% of all laryngeal neoplasms, and pose significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. This case report of a grade III neuroendocrine tumor in the supraglottic region underscores the importance of thorough diagnostic evaluations, including histopathological and immunohistochemical analysis, to accurately classify and grade the tumor. The distinctive immunohistochemical markers, such as synaptophysin, chromogranin, and Ki-67, are crucial for diagnosis and prognosis. Surgical intervention remains the primary treatment for these tumors, although the roles of chemotherapy and radiotherapy are still being defined. This case adds to the limited knowledge of laryngeal neuroendocrine tumors and highlights the need for continued research to develop standardized treatment protocols and improve patient outcomes.
ORCID
Sana Ahuja https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4630-016X
Sufian Zaheer https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8044-4327
REFERENCES
1. Ferlito A, Devaney KO, Rinaldo A. Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the larynx: advances in identification, understanding, and management. Oral Oncol 2006;42(8):770–788. DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2006.01.002
2. Goldman NC, Hood CI, Singleton GT. Carcinoid of the larynx. Arch Otolaryngol 1969;90(1):64–67. DOI: 10.1001/archotol.1969.00770030066013
3. Rindi G, Klimstra DS, Abedi-Ardekani B, et al. A common classification framework for neuroendocrine neoplasms: an International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) and World Health Organization (WHO) expert consensus proposal. Mod Pathol 2018;31(12):1770–1786. DOI: 10.1038/s41379-018-0110-y
4. Soga J, Osaka M, Yakuwa Y. Laryngeal endocrinomas (carcinoids and relevant neoplasms): analysis of 278 reported cases. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2002;21(1):5–13. PMID: 12071530.
5. Van der Laan TP, Plaat BE, van der Laan BF, et al. Clinical recommendations on the treatment of neuroendocrine carcinoma of the larynx: a meta-analysis of 436 reported cases. Head Neck 2015;37(5):707–715. DOI: 10.1002/hed.23666
6. Perez-Ordoñez B. Neuroendocrine carcinomas of the larynx and head and neck: challenges in classification and grading. Head Neck Pathol 2018;12(1):1–8. DOI: 10.1007/s12105-018-0894-6
7. Wenig BM, Hyams VJ, Heffner DK. Moderately differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma of the larynx: a clinicopathologic study of 54 cases. Cancer 1988;62(12):2658–2676. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19881215)62:12<2658::aid-cncr2820621235>3.0.co;2-m
8. Ferlito A, Friedmann I. Review of neuroendocrine carcinomas of the larynx. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1989;98(10):780–790. DOI: 10.1177/000348948909801006
9. Bal M, Sharma A, Rane SU, et al. Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the larynx: a clinicopathologic analysis of 27 neuroendocrine tumors and neuroendocrine carcinomas. Head Neck Pathol 2022;16(2):375–387. DOI: 10.1007/s12105-021-01367-9
10. Ferrarotto R, Testa L, Riechelmann RP, et al. Combination of capecitabine and oxaliplatin is an effective treatment option for advanced neuroendocrine tumors. Rare Tumors 2013;5(3):e35. DOI: 10.4081/rt.2013.e35
11. Wang KR, Jia YJ, Zhou SH, et al. Cutaneous and subcutaneous metastases from atypical laryngeal carcinoids: case report and review of the literature. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016;95(7):e2796. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002796
12. Bräutigam K, Rodriguez-Calero A, Kim-Fuchs C, et al. Update on histological reporting changes in neuroendocrine neoplasms. Curr Oncol Rep 2021;23(6):65. DOI: 10.1007/s11912-021-01062-6
13. Yuan C, Jiao F, Zhai C, et al. Application of INSM1 in diagnosis and grading of laryngeal neuroendocrine carcinoma. Laryngoscope 2021;131(10):E2662–E2668. DOI: 10.1002/lary.29554
14. Rai V, Malhotra V, Kumar N, et al. Laryngeal neuroendocrine tumor: atypical presentation. Int J Otorhinolaryngol Clin 2017;9(1):32–34. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10003-1258
15. Paudel D, Shrestha A, Chettri ST, et al. Neuroendocrine tumor of larynx: a case report. J Coll Med Sci Nepal 2020;16(1):54–56. DOI: 10.3126/jcmsn.v16i1.27133
16. Y H, X G, F J, et al. Atypical carcinoid of the larynx: a case report. Ear Nose Throat J 2023;102(11):NP556–NP558. DOI: 10.1177/01455613211024868
17. Mesolella M, Allosso S, Buono S, et al. Neuroendocrine carcinoma of the larynx with Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome: a rare case report and literature review. J Int Med Res 2021;49(5):3000605211014784. DOI: 10.1177/03000605211014784
18. Zhu Y, Gao L, Meng Y, et al. Laryngeal neuroendocrine carcinomas: a retrospective study of 14 cases. Biomed Res Int 2015;2015:832194. DOI: 10.1155/2015/832194
19. Feola T, Puliani G, Sesti F, et al. Laryngeal neuroendocrine tumor with elevated serum calcitonin: a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. Case report and review of literature. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2020;11:397. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2020.00397
________________________
© The Author(s). 2024 Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.