Indian Journal of Respiratory Care

IJRC Email      Register      Login

VOLUME 10 , ISSUE 3 ( September-December, 2021 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

Does Masimo Signal Extraction Technique Pulse-Oximeter Improve the Detection Rate of Congenital Heart Diseases of Newborn? - An Observational Study

Saranya Jayachandran, Laveena Diaz, Leslie Edward Lewis, Gokul G. Krishna

Keywords : Congenital heart disease, masimo, preterm, pulse oximetry

Citation Information : Jayachandran S, Diaz L, Lewis LE, Krishna GG. Does Masimo Signal Extraction Technique Pulse-Oximeter Improve the Detection Rate of Congenital Heart Diseases of Newborn? - An Observational Study. Indian J Respir Care 2021; 10 (3):336-340.

DOI: 10.4103/ijrc.ijrc_14_21

License: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Published Online: 06-12-2022

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2021; Indian Journal of Respiratory Care.


Introduction: Congenital heart diseases (CHDs) are common congenital anomalies, which if left untreated account for higher mortality and morbidity. Early detection and surgical correction of CHDs are the best treatment measures. The current study aims to test whether Masimo signal extraction technique (SET) pulse-oximeter, which uses signal extraction technology improves the detection rate of CHDs with its overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. Subjects and Methods: The current prospective, observational study was conducted at a tertiary medical center over a period of 2 years. All the neonates' pre- and post-ductal oxygen saturation along with clinical examination was performed within 24 h of life. Postductal reading of ≤ 95% and/or with difference between pre- and postductal of > 5% was considered to be positive for CHDs. Infants with clinical symptoms or test positive for pulse oximetry were referred for echocardiographic confirmation. Results: A total of 2213 infants were observed. Seventeen CHD cases were detected during the study period. Four hundred and fifteen infants tested positive with the pulse oximeter. Ten of them had minor or major CHD and two of the infants had critical CHD. The overall sensitivity of pulse oximetry screening was 70.59% (95% CI), specificity of 81.65%, and a diagnostic accuracy of 81% for any CHDs. Conclusion: Masimo SET pulse oximeter is a sensitive tool for detecting CHDs. A pulse oximeter in combination with clinical examination aids in the better detection rate of CHD. Echocardiography must be considered in all infants who test positive with pulse oximeter or any abnormal findings in the clinical examination.

  1. Wren C, Reinhardt Z, Khawaja K. Twenty-year trends in diagnosis of life-threatening neonatal cardiovascular malformations. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2008;93:F33-5.
  2. Bernier PL, Stefanescu A, Samoukovic G, Tchervenkov CI. The challenge of congenital heart disease worldwide: Epidemiologic and demographic facts. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr Card Surg Annu 2010;13:26-34.
  3. van der Linde D, Konings EE, Slager MA, Witsenburg M, Helbing WA, Takkenberg JJ, et al. Birth prevalence of congenital heart disease worldwide: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;58:2241-7.
  4. Chang RK, Gurvitz M, Rodriguez S. Missed diagnosis of critical congenital heart disease. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2008;162:969-74.
  5. Wren C, Richmond S, Donaldson L. Presentation of congenital heart disease in infancy: Implications for routine examination. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1999;80:F49-53.
  6. Kluckow M. Diagnostic accuracy of paediatric echocardiograms. J Paediatr Child Health 2002;38:108-10.
  7. Saxena A, Mehta A, Ramakrishnan S, Sharma M, Salhan S, Kalaivani M, et al. Pulse oximetry as a screening tool for detecting major congenital heart defects in Indian newborns. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2015;100:F416-21.
  8. Vaidyanathan B, Sathish G, Mohanan ST, Sundaram KR, Warrier KK, Kumar RK. Clinical screening for Congenital heart disease at birth: A prospective study in a community hospital in Kerala. Indian Pediatr 2011;48:25-30.
  9. Shah N, Ragaswamy HB, Govindugari K, Estanol L. Performance of three new-generation pulse oximeters during motion and low perfusion in volunteers. J Clin Anesth 2012;24:385-91.
  10. Zhao QM, Ma XJ, Ge XL, Liu F, Yan WL, et al. Pulse oximetry with clinical assessment to screen for congenital heart disease in neonates in China: A prospective study. Lancet 2014;384:747-54.
  11. Hoke TR, Donohue PK, Bawa PK, Mitchell RD, Pathak A, Rowe PC, et al. Oxygen saturation as a screening test for critical congenital heart disease: A preliminary study. Pediatr Cardiol 2002;23:403-9.
  12. Ewer AK, Middleton LJ, Furmston AT, Bhoyar A, Daniels JP, Thangaratinam S, et al. Pulse oximetry screening for congenital heart defects in newborn infants (PulseOx): A test accuracy study. Lancet 2011;378:785-94.
  13. Martin GR, Brasshwa EA. Sensitivity of pulseoximetry for detection of critical congenital heart defects in newborn infants higher than that of antenatal ultrasound with few false positives. Evid Based Med 2012;17:57-8.
  14. Mahle WT, Newburger JW, Matherne GP, Smith FC, Hoke TR, Koppel R, et al. Role of pulse oximetry in examining newborns for congenital heart disease: A scientific statement from the AHA and AAP. Pediatrics 2009;124:823-36.
  15. Valmari P. Should pulse oximetry be used to screen for congenital heart disease. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2007;92:F219.
  16. Plana MN, Zamora J, Suresh G, Fernandez-Pineda L, Thangaratinam S, Ewer AK. Pulse oximetry screening for critical congenital heart defects. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018;3:CD011912.
  17. Phattraprayoon N, Sardesai S, Durand M, Ramanathan R. Accuracy of pulse oximeter readings from probe placement on newborn wrist and ankle. J Perinatol 2012;32:276-80.
  18. Hay WW Jr., Brockway JM, Eyzaguirre M. Neonatal pulse oximetry: Accuracy and reliability. Pediatrics 1989;83:717-22.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.