Indian Journal of Respiratory Care

IJRC Email      Register      Login

VOLUME 13 , ISSUE 4 ( October-December, 2024 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

Analyzing Factors Influencing Mortality in Acute Respiratory Failure: A Comprehensive Study of 275 Patients

Swaroopa Deme, Ramya Durgam, Bhaskar Kakarla

Keywords : Mortality, Pneumonia, Poisoning

Citation Information : Deme S, Durgam R, Kakarla B. Analyzing Factors Influencing Mortality in Acute Respiratory Failure: A Comprehensive Study of 275 Patients. Indian J Respir Care 2024; 13 (4):233-237.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-11010-1139

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 17-02-2025

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2024; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aim and background: To analyze the demographic, clinical, and outcome characteristics of patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF) and to assess the impact of various factors on patient outcomes. Materials and methods: A total of 275 patients with ARF were included in this study. The mean age of patients was 48.18 ± 16.34 years, with a male predominance (64.0%). The distribution of respiratory failure types was as follows: 78.5% had type 1, 18.5% had both type 1 and type 2, and 2.9% had type 2 respiratory failure. Patients received different types of respiratory support: 50.5% with oxygen therapy (face mask, nasal cannula, etc.), 24.4% with noninvasive ventilation (NIV), and 25.1% required mechanical ventilation. Results: The most common etiology was pneumonia (18.5%), followed by heart failure (18.2%), poisoning (17.1%), sepsis (16.4%), and acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (7.3%). Additional etiologies included acute pancreatitis, fluid overload, diabetic ketoacidosis, malignancies, and other less common conditions. The predominant symptom at presentation was breathlessness (58.2%), with fever (33.1%), cough (23.6%), and vomiting (23.3%) also frequently observed. The mortality rate was 77.1%, with 22.9% of patients being discharged. Significant associations were found between mortality and poisoning (χ2 = 13.862, p < 0.001), altered sensorium (χ2 = 4.054, p = 0.044), and vomiting (χ2 = 5.117, p = 0.024). Fever was associated with a higher likelihood of discharge (χ2 = 4.758, p = 0.029). There was no significant difference in outcomes based on the type of respiratory failure (χ2 = 1.144, p = 0.564). However, the type of respiratory support significantly impacted outcomes, with mechanical ventilation being associated with higher mortality (χ2 = 15.873, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Pneumonia was the most common cause of ARF, and breathlessness was the most common symptom. Mortality was high, with significant associations between certain presenting symptoms and outcomes. Respiratory support type significantly influenced patient outcomes, highlighting the critical role of tailored respiratory management in improving survival. Clinical significance: Early identification and tailored management of ARF, including careful selection of respiratory support and attention to high-risk symptoms, are crucial for improving outcomes.


PDF Share
  1. Hanley ME, Bone RC. Acute respiratory failure: pathophysiology, causes, and clinical manifestations. Postgrad Med 1986;79(1):166–176. DOI: 10.1080/00325481.1986.11699244
  2. Mirabile VS, Shebl E, Sankari A, et al. Respiratory failure in adults. [Updated 2023 Jun 11]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024 Jan.
  3. Summers C, Todd RS, Vercruysse GA, et al. Acute respiratory failure. Perioperative Medicine 2022:576–586. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-323-56724-4.00039-3
  4. Roussos C, Koutsoukou A. Respiratory failure. Eur Respir J Suppl 2003;22(47 suppl):3s–14s. DOI: 10.1183/09031936.03.00038503
  5. Magazine R, Rao S, Chogtu B, et al. Epidemiological profile of acute respiratory distress syndrome patients: A tertiary care experience. Lung India. 2017;34(1):38–42. DOI: 10.4103/0970-2113.197097
  6. Luhr OR, Antonsen K, Karlsson M, et al. Incidence and mortality after acute respiratory failure and acute respiratory distress syndrome in Sweden, Denmark, and Iceland. The ARF Study Group. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999;159(6):1849–1861. DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm.159.6.9808136
  7. Stefan MS, Shieh MS, Pekow PS, et al. Epidemiology and outcomes of acute respiratory failure in the United States, 2001 to 2009: a national survey. J Hosp Med 2013;8(2):76–82. DOI: 10.1002/jhm.2004
  8. Behrendt CE. Acute respiratory failure in the United States: incidence and 31-day survival. Chest 2000;118(4):1100–1105. DOI: 10.1378/chest.118.4.1100
  9. Parcha V, Kalra R, Bhatt SP, et al. Trends and geographic variation in acute respiratory failure and ARDS mortality in the United States. Chest 2021;159(4):1460–1472. DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.10.042
  10. Ray P, Birolleau S, Lefort Y, et al. Acute respiratory failure in the elderly: etiology, emergency diagnosis and prognosis. Crit Care 2006;10(3):R82. DOI: 10.1186/cc4926
  11. Chen WL, Chen CM, Kung SC, et al. The outcomes and prognostic factors of acute respiratory failure in the patients 90 years old and over. Oncotarget 2018;9(6):7197–7203. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.24051. Erratum in: Oncotarget. 2018;9(21):15817. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.24864
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.