Indian Journal of Respiratory Care

IJRC Email      Register      Login

VOLUME 2 , ISSUE 1 ( January-June, 2013 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

Comparison between gum elastic bougie and malleable stylet as aids to intubation during application of cricoid pressure: a prospective randomised controlled study

M Jyothsna, U. K. Shenoy

Keywords : Bougie, cricoid pressure, rapid sequence intubation, stylet

Citation Information : Jyothsna M, Shenoy UK. Comparison between gum elastic bougie and malleable stylet as aids to intubation during application of cricoid pressure: a prospective randomised controlled study. Indian J Respir Care 2013; 2 (1):200-205.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-11010-02106

License: NA

Published Online: 05-12-2022

Copyright Statement:  NA


Background: Rapid sequence intubation with application of cricoid pressure is widely practiced in all emergency situations to prevent aspiration of gastric contents. Stylet or gum elastic bougie is used as intubation aid for rapidly securing the airway. Aim: To compare gum elastic bougie and malleable stylet as aids for endotracheal intubation during application of cricoid pressure. Results: Endotracheal intubation was successful in the first attempt in all of the 60 patients enrolled in the study. Time taken for laryngoscopy and intubation was clinically similar in both the groups of patients. However, in the stylet group, successful ET intubation was achieved in about 7 sec less when compared to the bougie group (p< 0.05). Ease of intubation as compared using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score was similar in both groups. Laryngeal view improved in 22 patients of 60 patients (36.66%) after application of cricoid pressure, while it remained the same as before in 22. Overall, the grade remained the same or improved after cricoid pressure in 73.3% of patients. The laryngeal view worsened in 16 patients (27.7%). Conclusion: Gum elastic bougie and stylet are equally effective intubation aids during rapid sequence intubation. Intubation aided by bougie takes more time than that of a stylet, even though it is clinically trivial. Cricoid pressure does not affect the laryngoscopic visualisation of glottis in majority of patients.

  1. Sellick, BA. Cricoid pressure to control regurgitation of stomach contents during induction of anaesthesia. The Lancet 1961;278:404-6.
  2. Macintosh RR. An aid to oral intubation. BMJ 1949;1:28.
  3. Noguchi T, Koga K, Shiga Y, Shigematsu A. The gum elastic bougie eases tracheal intubation while applying cricoid pressure compared to a stylet. Can J Anaesth 2003;50:712-7.
  4. Messa MJ, Kupas DF, Dunham DL. Comparison of bougie-assisted intubation with traditional endotracheal intubation in a simulated difficult airway. Prehosp Emerg Care 2011;15:30-3.
  5. Gataure PS, Vaughan RS, Latto IP. Simulated difficult intubation. Comparison of the gum elastic bougie and the stylet. Anaesthesia 1996;51:935-8.
  6. Brimacombe JR, Berry AM. Cricoid pressure. Can J Anaesth 1997;44:414-25.
  7. Melker RJ. Airway devices and their application. In: Kirby RR, Gravenstein N, Lobato EB, Gravenstein JS (Eds). Clinical Anesthesia Practice, 2nd ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Co; 2001:303-28.
  8. Vanner RG, Clarke P, Moore WJ, Raftery S. The effect of cricoid pressure and neck support on the view at laryngoscopy. Anaesthesia 1997;52:896-913.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.