Indian Journal of Respiratory Care

IJRC Email      Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Volume  13 (2024)
Volume  12 (2023)
Volume  11 (2022)
Volume  10 (2021)
Volume  9 (2020)
Volume  8 (2019)
Volume  7 (2018)
Volume  6 (2017)
Volume  5 (2016)
Volume  4 (2015)
Volume  3 (2014)
Volume  2 (2013)
Volume  1 (2012)
Related articles

VOLUME 2 , ISSUE 2 ( July-December, 2013 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

Efficacy of recruitment manoeuvre with or without antiderecruitment strategy in ARDS patients: A prospective study

Heera Lal Mahto

Keywords : Acute respiratory distress syndrome, antiderecruitment strategy, recruitment manoeuvre

Citation Information : Mahto HL. Efficacy of recruitment manoeuvre with or without antiderecruitment strategy in ARDS patients: A prospective study. Indian J Respir Care 2013; 2 (2):284-291.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-11010-02206

License: NA

Published Online: 05-12-2022

Copyright Statement:  NA


Abstract

Introduction: Lung recruitment manoeuvre (RM) opens up collapsed segments of the ARDS lung but the collapse may reappear once the RM is complete and pre-RM positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is applied. Aim: Evaluation of the outcome of setting PEEP using decrement PEEP titration (antiderecruitment manoeuvre - ADRM) after an alveolar recruitment manoeuvre (RM) in ARDS patients. Methods: Twenty four mechanically ventilated adult patients with ARDS were enrolled. This was a randomised, prospective study. After recording baseline parameters, on pressure control ventilation and stabilisation, RM was performed. The responders were randomly assigned to one of two groups: ‘Antiderecruitment RM’ (ADRM) group and ‘Only RM’ (RM) group. ADRM group received RM using volume control ventilation and optimal PEEP was set after RM using decremental PEEP titration method. The RM group patients were returned to baseline ventilator settings after manoeuvre. Results: Of the 24 patients, 13 were males and 11 female. The mean (± SD) age was 43 (± 13.43) years. Twelve patients responded to the initial recruitment manoeuvre of which six were assigned to RM group and six to ADRM group. There was no difference in survival rate between the groups. The ICU and hospital stay were shorter in patients in ADRM group as compared to only RM group. Conclusion: Only half of the patients with ARDS respond to recruitment manoeuvres with an improvement in oxygenation. In most responders, the improvement is sustained irrespective of whether RM only or ADRM was used. Mortality is high if the baseline P/F ratio is below 90.

HTML PDF Share
  1. Dreyfuss D, Basset F, Soler P, Saumon G. Intermittent positive pressure hyperventilation with high inflation pressures produces pulmonary microvascular injury in rats. Am Rev Respir Dis 1985; 132:880-4.
  2. Kolobow T, Moretti MP, Fumagalli R, et al. Severe impairment in lung function induced by high peak airway pressure during mechanical ventilation. Am Rev Respir Dis 1987; 135:312-5.
  3. Gattinoni L, Caironi P, Cressoni M, et al. Lung recruitment in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 2006; 354:1775-86.
  4. Rouby JJ, Lu Q, Goldstein I. Selecting the right level of positive end-expiratory pressure in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002; 165:1182-6.
  5. Jin Won Huh, Hoon Jung, Hye Sook Choi, Sang-Bum Hong, Chae-Man Lim, Younsuck Koh. Efficacy of positive end-expiratory pressure titration after the alveolar recruitment manoeuvre in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care 2009; 13:1186.
  6. Ashbaugh DG, Bigelow DB, Petty TL, Levine BE. Acute respiratory distress in adults. Lancet 1967; 2:319-23.
  7. Jesús Villar. What Is the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome? Respir Care 2011; 56: 1539 -45.
  8. Grasso S, Mascia L, Del Turco M, et al. Effects of recruiting manoeuvres in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome ventilated with protective ventilatory strategy. Anesthesiology 2002; 96:795-802.
  9. Jin Won Huh, Hoon Jung, Hye Sook Choi, Sang-Bum Hong, Chae-Man Lim, Younsuck Koh. Efficacy of positive end-expiratory pressure titration after the alveolar recruitment manoeuvre in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care 2009; 13:1186.
  10. Lachmann B. Open up the lung and keep the lung open. Intensive Care Med 1992; 18:319-21.
  11. Artigas A, Bernard GR, Carlet J, et al. The American-European Consensus Conference on ARDS, part 2: ventilatory, pharmacologic, supportive therapy, study design strategies, and issues related to recovery and remodeling. Acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998; 157:1332-47.
  12. Barbas CS. Lung recruitment manoeuvres in acute respiratory distress syndrome and facilitating resolutions. Crit Care Med 2003; 31: S265-S271.
  13. Brower RG, Lanken PN, MacIntyre N, et al. Higher versus lower positive end-expiratory pressures in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 2004; 351:327- 36.
  14. Moloney ED, Griffiths MJ. Protective ventilation of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Br J Anaesth 2004; 92:261- 70.
  15. Amato MB, Barbas CS, Medeiros DM, et al. Effect of a protective-ventilation strategy on mortality in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 1998; 338:347-54.
  16. Papadakos PJ, Lachmann B. The open lung concept of alveolar recruitment can improve outcome in respiratory failure and ARDS. Mt Sinai J Med 2002; 69:73-7.
  17. Brower RG, Lanken PN, MacIntyre N, et al. Higher versus lower positive end-expiratory pressures in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 2004; 351:327- 36.
  18. Medoff BD, Harris RS, Kesselman H, Venegas J, Amato MB, Hess D. Use of recruitment maneuvers and high-positive end-expiratory pressure in a patient with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med 2000; 28:1210- 6.
  19. Halter JM, Steinberg JM, Schiller HJ, et al. Positive end-expiratory pressure after a recruitment manoeuvre prevents both alveolar collapse and recruitment/derecruitment. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003; 167:1620-6.
  20. Lim CM, Jung H, Koh Y, et al. Effect of alveolar recruitment manoeuvre in early acute respiratory distress syndrome according to antiderecruitment strategy, etiological category of diffuse lung injury, and body position of the patient. Crit Care Med 2003; 31:411-8.
  21. Rimensberger PC, Pristine G, Mullen BM, et al. Lung recruitment during small tidal volume ventilation allows minimal positive endexpiratory pressure without augmenting lung injury. Crit Care Med 1999; 27:1940–5
  22. Hickling KG. The pressure-volume curve is greatly modified by recruitment: A mathematical model of ARDS lungs. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998; 158:194–202
  23. Pelosi P, Goldner M, McKibben A, et al. Recruitment and derecruitment during acute respiratory failure: An experimental study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001; 164:122-30.
  24. Borges JB, Okamoto VN, Matos GF, et al. Reversibility of lung collapse and hypoxemia in early acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2006; 174:268-78.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.