Indian Journal of Respiratory Care

IJRC Email      Register      Login

VOLUME 3 , ISSUE 2 ( July-December, 2014 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

Effect of oxygen injection sites on fraction of delivered oxygen (FDO2) during noninvasive ventilation – An experimental lung model study

Lincy Devasia, Heera Lal Mahto

Keywords : Delivered oxygen concentration, noninvasive ventilation, oxygen injection site

Citation Information : Devasia L, Mahto HL. Effect of oxygen injection sites on fraction of delivered oxygen (FDO2) during noninvasive ventilation – An experimental lung model study. Indian J Respir Care 2014; 3 (2):440-443.

DOI: 10.5005/ijrc-3-2-440

License: NA

Published Online: 30-11-2022

Copyright Statement:  NA


Introduction: The two-level noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) is the most commonly used mode of ventilation in the treatment of early respiratory failure. During NPPV, the inspired oxygen fraction (FiO2) could be influenced by various factors such as the inspiratory positive airway pressure (IPAP), the expiratory positive airway pressure (EPAP), the O2 flow rate and the site where O2 is added to the circuit. Aim: To investigate the effect of IPAP, EPAP, O2 flow rate, leak and the O2 injection sites on the fraction of delivered oxygen (FDO2). Methodology: A lung model was constructed to simulate noninvasive ventilation with bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP) without leak and with 10% leak, the oxygen analyser was placed proximal to the ventilator to measure FDO2 when oxygen was injected at three different sites. The portable BIPAP device was set to spontaneous/timed mode. Inspiratory and expiratory pressures of the BIPAP device were set at 10/5, 15/5, 15/10 and 20/10 cm H2O. Results: This study revealed that there is a variation in the FDO2 with a change in the position of connection of oxygen tubing, leak in the system and the oxygen flow rate. Conclusion: During NPPV, the FDO2 varies significantly with O2 flow rate and presence of leak. Higher O2 flow rates and lower amounts of leak provide a higher FDO2. Higher FDO2 is achieved if the oxygen tubing is connected proximal to the patient whereas the effect of ventilator settings on FDO2 is not significant.

  1. American Thoracic Society; European Respiratory Society; European Society of Intensive Care Medicine; Société de Réanimationde Langue Franaise. International consensus conferences in intensive care medicine: noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in acute respiratory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001;163:283-91.
  2. Nava S, Hill N. Noninvasive ventilation in acute respiratory failure. Lancet 2009; 374:250-9.
  3. Ambrosino N, Vagheggini G. Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in the acute care setting: where are we? EurRespir J 2008; 31:874-86.
  4. Meyer TJ, Hill NS. Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation to treat respiratory failure. Ann Intern Med 1994; 120:760-70.
  5. Freichels TA. Palliative ventilatory support: Use of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in terminal respiratory insufficiency. Am J Crit Care 1994; 3: 6-10.
  6. Pennock BE, Crawshaw L, Kaplan PD. Noninvasive nasal mask ventilation for acute respiratory failure: Institution of a new therapeutic technology for routine use. Chest 1994; 105:441-4.
  7. Wysocki M, Tric L, Wolff MA, et al. Noninvasive pressure support ventilation in patients with acute respiratory failure. Chest 1993;103: 907-913.
  8. Foglio C, Vittaca M, Quadri A, et al. Acute exacerbation in COLD patients: Treatment using positive pressure ventilation by nasal mask. Chest 1992; 101:1533-8.
  9. Meduri GU. Noninvasivepositive pressure ventilation in patients with acute respiratory failure. Clin Chest Med 1996; 17:513-33.
  10. Meduri GU, Abou-Shala N, Fox RC, et al. Noninvasive facemask mechanical ventilation in patients with acute hypercapnic respiratory failure. Chest 1991; 100:445-54.
  11. Barbe F, Togores B, Rubi M, et al. Noninvasive ventilatory support does not facilitate recovery from acute respiratory pulmonary disease. Eur Respir J 1996; 9:1240-5.
  12. Bott J, Carroll M, Conway J, et al. A randomized controlled study of nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation in acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive airways disease. Lancet 1993; 341:1555-7.
  13. Pollack CV, Torres MT, Alexander L. Feasibility study of the use of bilevel positive airway pressure for respiratory support in emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 1996; 27: 189-92.
  14. Celikel T, Sungur M, Ceyhan B, Karakurt S.Comparison of noninvasive positive pressure ventilatio nwith standard medical therapy in hypercapnic acute respiratory failure. Chest 1998; 114:1636-42.
  15. Thys F, Roeseler J, Delaere S, et al. Two-level noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in the initial treatment of acute respiratory failure in an emergency department. Eur J Emerg Med 1999; 6:207-14.
  16. Windisch W, Brumbring J, Budweiser S, et al. Guideline for noninvasive mechanical ventilation for treatment of chronic respiratory failure. Pneumologie 2010; 64:640-52.
  17. Thys F, Liistro G, Dozin O, Marion E, Rodenstein DO. Determinants of FDO2 with oxygen supplementation during noninvasive two-level positive pressure ventilation. Eur Respir J 2002; 19:653-7.
  18. Schwartz AR, Kacmarek RM, Hess DR. Factors affecting oxygen delivery with bi-level positive airway pressure. Respir Care 2004; 49:270-5.
  19. International Consensus Conferences in Intensive Care Medicine: noninvasive positive ressure ventilation in acute respiratory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001; 163:283-91.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.