Indian Journal of Respiratory Care

IJRC Email      Register      Login

VOLUME 9 , ISSUE 2 ( July-December, 2020 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

Factors Predicting Outcomes of Tracheostomy Decannulation Among the Patients at a Tertiary Care Centre at Riyadh, Saudi Arabia - A Retrospective, Observational Study

Prachi Tambur, Farhan Alenezi, Winnie Philip, Sulochana Kumari, Lojain Ebrahim Almaniei, Maram Srwi Asiri, Amjad Mubarak Alshahrani

Keywords : Decannulation protocol, safe hospital discharge, surgical tracheostomy, tracheostomy team

Citation Information : Tambur P, Alenezi F, Philip W, Kumari S, Almaniei LE, Asiri MS, Alshahrani AM. Factors Predicting Outcomes of Tracheostomy Decannulation Among the Patients at a Tertiary Care Centre at Riyadh, Saudi Arabia - A Retrospective, Observational Study. Indian J Respir Care 2020; 9 (2):199-203.

DOI: 10.4103/ijrc.ijrc_7_20

License: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Published Online: 08-12-2022

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2020; Indian Journal of Respiratory Care.


Introduction: Decannulation, the removal of the tracheostomy tube, is an essential procedure that a treating team must consider for all tracheostomized patients. There is a lack of evidence available regarding the factors that are associated with the outcomes of the decannulation process. The study aims to detect the outcome of decannulation, describe factors associated with failed decannulation and to describe the decannulation practice in adult patients at a tertiary hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Methodology: We performed a retrospective descriptive study for 210 tracheostomized patients aged 18 and above from January 2016 to December 2017. Demographic data, tracheostomy data, and decannulation process data were collected and entered in Microsoft Excel and exported to SPSS for the analysis. Results: Among 210 patients, the majority of tracheostomies were done at the bedside (55.2%). A total of 186 (88.6%) patients were successfully decannulated within 6 months. Obesity, comorbidity, and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) during admission were not associated with failure. Faster decannulation (73.5%) was found in those patients ventilated <7 days. Among 41 patients who underwent failed trials of decannulation, the most common reason of failure was desaturation in 19 patients (46.3%). Six patients of them had a combination of desaturation with other factors such as secretions, low GCS, and vocal cord paralysis. Conclusion: Successful decannulation within 7 days is related to the presence of full tracheostomy team. However, having a protocol approach will be more helpful. The study showed favorable outcome for young patients and those who had an early tracheostomy in the intensive care unit.

  1. Krishnan K, Elliot SC, Mallick A. The current practice of tracheostomy in the United Kingdom: A postal survey. Anaesthesia 2005;60:360-4.
  2. Engels PT, Bagshaw SM, Meier M, Brindley PG. Tracheostomy: From insertion to decannulation. Cancer J Surg 2009;52:427-33.
  3. Kutsukutsa J, Mashamba-Thompson TP, Saman Y. Tracheostomy decannulation methods and procedures in adults: A systematic scoping review protocol. Syst Rev 2017;6:4-9.
  4. O 'Connor HH, White AC. Tracheostomy decannulation introduction process of weaning and routine decannulation managing accidental decannulation postdecannulation monitoring decannulation failure and alternatives to decannulation summary. Respir Care 2010;55:1076-81.
  5. Stelfox HT, Crimi C, Berra L, Noto A, Schmidt U, Bigatello LM, et al. Determinants of tracheostomy decannulation: An international survey. Crit Care 2008;12:1-9.
  6. O'Connor HH, Kirby KJ, Terrin N, Hill NS, White AC. Decannulation following tracheostomy for prolonged mechanical ventilation. J Intensive Care Med 2009;24:187-94.
  7. Budweiser S, Baur T, Jörres RA, Kollert F, Pfeifer M, Heinemann F. Predictors of successful decannulation using a tracheostomy retainer in patients with prolonged weaning and persisting respiratory failure. Respiration 2012;84:469-76.
  8. Perin C, Meroni R, Rega V, Braghetto G, Cerri C. Parameters influencing tracheostomy decannulation in patients undergoing rehabilitation after severe acquired brain injury: Parameters influencing tracheostomy decannulation in patients undergoing rehabilitation after severe acquired brain injury (SABI). Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2017; 21:382-9.
  9. Hernández G, Ortiz R, Pedrosa A, Cuena R, Vaquero Collado C, González Arenas P, et al. The indication of tracheotomy conditions the predictors of time to decannulation in critical patients. Med Intensiva (English Ed) 2012;36:531-9. Available from: [Last accessed on 2012 Nov 25].
  10. Santus P, Gramegna A, Radovanovic D, Raccanelli R, Valenti V, Rabbiosi D, et al. A systematic review on tracheostomy decannulation: A proposal of a quantitative semiquantitative clinical score. BMC Pulm Med 2014;14:1-8.
  11. Duan J, Liu J, Xiao M, Yang X, Wu J, Zhou L. Voluntary is better than involuntary cough peak flow for predicting re-intubation after scheduled extubation in cooperative subjects. Respir Care 2014;59:1643-51. Available from:
  12. Ahmed R, Tabish S, Zaidi R, Husein H, Moshtohry H, Ahmad K, et al. Early decannulation, repatriation, and hospital discharges by introducing a tracheostomy care task force for noncritical care tracheostomized patients. Ashdin Public J Orthop Trauma 2012;2:4.
  13. Ceriana P, Carlucci A, Navalesi P, Rampulla C, Delmastro M, Piaggi G, et al. Weaning from tracheotomy in long-term mechanically ventilated patients: Feasibility of a decisional flowchart and clinical outcome. Intensive Care Med 2003;29:845-8.
  14. Christopher KL. Tracheostomy decannulation. Respir Care 2005;50:538-41.
  15. De Leyn P, Bedert L, Delcroix M, Depuydt P, Lauwers G, Sokolov Y, et al. Tracheotomy: Clinical review and guidelines. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2007;32:412-21.
  16. Garuti G, Reverberi C, Briganti A, Massobrio M, Lombardi F, Lusuardi M. Swallowing disorders in tracheostomised patients: A multidisciplinary/multiprofessional approach in decannulation protocols. Multidiscip Respir Med 2014;9:1-10.
  17. Bertolino C, Biacca M, Mazzari P, Comberiati R, Giordano D, Mezzadri E, et al. Integrated management protocol of the tracheostomy tube in severe brain injury: Preliminary results. In: SIMFER, editor. Proceedings Abstract Book of the 37th National Congress of Italian Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine: 20-23 September 2009. Campobasso; 2009. p. 53.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.