• Users Online: 113
  • Print this page
  • Email this page


 
 Table of Contents  
LETTER TO EDITOR
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 9  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 245-246

Aftermath of COVID-19: Adieu stethoscope?


1 Department of Anesthesiology, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, Bihar, India
2 Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, ITS Dental College, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India
3 Undergraduate, MGM Medical College, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

Date of Submission09-Apr-2020
Date of Acceptance10-Apr-2020
Date of Web Publication19-Jun-2020

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Prakash K Dubey
E 3/4, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences Campus, Patna - 800 014, Bihar
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijrc.ijrc_29_20

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Dubey PK, Dubey P, Dubey N. Aftermath of COVID-19: Adieu stethoscope?. Indian J Respir Care 2020;9:245-6

How to cite this URL:
Dubey PK, Dubey P, Dubey N. Aftermath of COVID-19: Adieu stethoscope?. Indian J Respir Care [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 Oct 26];9:245-6. Available from: http://www.ijrc.in/text.asp?2020/9/2/245/287303



Sir,

Recent outbreak of COVID-19 has greatly influenced the practice of anesthesiology and critical care by throwing unique challenges for anesthesiologists. The nature of spread of this virus has put a big question mark on the utility of stethoscope in our practice. A recent article highlights the precautions to be undertaken while intubating patients with COVID-19.[1] They have pointed out that confirming the depth of the tracheal tube is extremely difficult using auscultation while wearing isolation suits. They have suggested observing bilateral chest expansion, ventilator breathing waveform, and end-tidal capnography as better indications of successful tracheal intubation. We suggest point-of-care ultrasonography for the confirmation of proper placement of the tracheal tube in these settings. It has been shown that ultrasonography, capnography, and conventional clinical auscultatory methods have comparable sensitivity and specificity in identifying tracheal or esophageal position of the tracheal tube. However, correct position of the tube is detected faster with ultrasound compared to the other two methods.[2] The speed of detection becomes more important when it has been recommended to attempt rapid sequence induction in patients with COVID-19.[1] Safety of healthcare workers during the airway management of patients with COVID-19 should be of paramount importance.[3] It is difficult to have specific covers for a stethoscope, leading to a higher probability of a nosocomial spread of the virus.[4] It has also been suggested that during an outbreak such as COVID-19, there is also a need to guarantee the patient's right to be evaluated according to the highest standards of care.[4] In this scenario, the use of point-of-care lung ultrasonography for the evaluation of successful and correct tracheal intubation not only fulfils all the objectives but also eliminates the use of a potential source for virus spread.

Based on the current experiences, lung ultrasonography has proved useful to diagnose pneumonia as well as to monitor and follow-up patients with COVID-19.[5] This view is based on the widespread availability of ultrasonography in healthcare setups worldwide, its portability, and the objective of standardization of diagnosis and treatment protocols. Wireless probe and tablets are recommended as the most appropriate ultrasound equipment in the setting of COVID-19. It is possible to wrap these in single use plastic covers to reduce the risk of contamination and ease sterilization procedures.[4] They are also less expensive than usual ultrasound machines including the portable ones.

Portable machines dedicated to the exclusive use of COVID-19 patients must have probe and keyboard covers, and sterilization procedures must be carried out as per recommendations.[6] The iconic stethoscope has been the symbol and pride of the physicians worldwide for more than two centuries. With pandemics like COVID-19, digital technology is bound to take over heralding a paradigm shift in the bedside clinical diagnosis tools.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Luo M, Cao S, Wei L, Tang R, Hong S, Liu R, et al. Precautions for intubating patients with COVID-19. Anesthesiology 2020. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003288. [Epub ahead of print].  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Thomas VK, Paul C, Rajeev PC, Palatty BU. Reliability of ultrasonography in confirming endotracheal tube placement in an emergency setting. Indian J Crit Care Med 2017;21:257-61.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
3.
Cheung JC, Ho LT, Cheng JV, Cham EY, Lam KN. Staff safety during emergency airway management for COVID-19 in Hong Kong. Lancet Respir Med 2020;8:e19.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Buonsenso D, Pata D, Chiaretti A. Less stethoscope more ultrasound. Lancet Respir Med 2020. pii: S2213-2600(20)30120-X.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Kampf G, Todt D, Pfaender S, Steinmann E. Persistence of coronaviruses on inanimate surfaces and their inactivation with biocidal agents. J Hosp Infect 2020;104:246-51.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Soldati G, Smargiassi A, Inchingolo R, Buonsenso D, Perrone T, Briganti DF, et al. Proposal for international standardization of the use of lung ultrasound for COVID-19 patients; a simple, quantitative, reproducible method. J Ultrasound Med 2020. doi: 10.1002/jum.15285. [Epub ahead of print].  Back to cited text no. 6
    




 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed394    
    Printed45    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded73    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]